DeepSeek Is Good News For The AI Gold Rush

•  In July and August of the past year, I explained the world had entered an AI and tech gold rush. Enormous amounts of money were pouring into building computer models that could extract and interpret golden data.

• Since that time, the number of AI miners and camp followers has exploded, making AI or Nvdia names that even your grandmother knows.

• In those articles, I cautioned that I believed the AI miners would find golden data, but how much of it they would find and how much investors would be willing to pay for it were big question marks.

• The other reality that I saw was that, with AI, we are in the mining phase, not the golden-products phase. No single product or service stands out at present as the game-changing prototype of things to come. 

This past week, a more ecnomical Chinese DeepSeek model caused lots of wild gyrations of most tech stocks. Net, net the tech market ended down only 3-4%. On the surface, DeepSeek, which costs a fraction of that of an NVDA, chip would seem to be a category crushing piece of software.

That many big techs rose sharply, such as GOOGL, AMZN, and Meta reminds us of what stage we are traversing in the gold rush. In short, those stocks rising clearly suggest that we are in the mining stage of the gold rush and not in the ingot stage. 

AMZN may be the biggest benefactor of the AI gold rush of any stock in America. They have millions of employees, millions of products, thousands of warehouses, millions of delivery miles worldwide, and billions of customers. If a better, more efficient, and less costly means of doing business is not in AMZN's future, AI will be the biggest bust since Beany Babies. 

Other giant benefactors of AI will be WMT, COST, the banking and insurance industries, and the industrial sector. If industrial sector companies like Raytheon, Caterpillar, Honeywell, 3M, and GE are to 'reshore', jobs from overseas, they must extract enormous costs from domestic manufacturing. My guess is they can do it, but it will take years, maybe decades, to get it done.

I believe DeepSeek will ultimately be viewed as a boon to the AI industry. It reduces the cost of participating in the AI gold rush and broadens the number of institutions and people who can afford to play.

Greg Donaldson has founded or co-founded four investment advisory firms and two families of mutual funds. He has authored two books, one on investing and a book of poetry published soon after he was out of college.  

This article is not intended as investment advice. You should seek an investment professional's views before making any investment. 

These views I have shared here are my own and not any company I am associated with.

It's Official: The AI Goldrush Is Underway

 

1. Near the end of the dot-com bubble in 2000, my business partner and I stumbled onto the notion that the techs were acting much like a gold rush. Gold was being found in the dot-com world and creating riches, but its passion was producing ever more gold miners with golden dreams.

2. Our company had traversed the dot-com craze during the late 1990s, chasing the gold like everyone else. But in early 2000, our valuation models simply could not justify the tech prices . .  . not by a mile.

3. A simple truth spoke to us: Never in the history of the US stock markets had an industry grown fast enough, long enough, to justify the prices of most tech and big consumer stocks.

4. We decided to cut back on the hottest of the highflyers. It changed our company and our lives forever.

This seemingly bold move was not based on something we were convinced we knew, but just the opposite. It was because we knew we did not know how to value the techs, and that being the case, we decided to stand aside. Even then, there was nothing bold about our decision to start cutting back on techs. In fact, we visited every client we had and admitted to them we believed the techs had reached the gold-rush state, but they might just keep going higher like they had over the last decade. The only thing we could say for sure was that our valuation models showed that many slower-growing companies were great values. We advised them we recommended placing sell orders 15% below the current prices on the six most overvalued tech stocks. Should any of these sell orders be triggered, we would invest the proceeds in undervalued dividend-paying stocks with dominant positions in their industries. 

During the year 2000, all six of the stocks' sell orders were triggered, and we bought financials, consumer staples, and industrial companies whose prices had gone flat in recent years because their sales and earnings were growing in the high single digits, much less than the 25-50% annual earnings growth of the techs. Interestingly, these undervalued dividend-paying stocks actually rose in 2000 when the overall market fell by over 10% and the dot-com gold rush ended. 

Why am I sharing this old tale? Am I predicting the AI gold rush is near its end? Indeed, are there other stocks that offer much better value with good prospects for future growth? No I’m not. I am announcing; however, that the gold rush in AI is now a reality and there are two truisms about gold rushes of the past. 1) When everyone, everywhere knows that an industry or a particular stock is the center of the investing universe, there is a good chance that everyone owns the stocks and the new money needed to push the stock higher will soon be tapped out. 2) The analysis at the end of gold rushes has always revealed that the companies that sold the picks and shovels for the miners were the best place to put your money, not in the gold miners themselves.

As one who is old enough to remember the dot-com collapse, my reason for writing this blog is to just give everyone a heads up that in my judgment, the AI phenomenon has officially reached the gold rush state. I said last time, my valuation models are showing that an S&P 500 level of 5700 is reasonable. If the AI world can produce overall sales and earning growth for corporate America of 11-12% over the next five years, the market is fairly priced. If earnings growth is higher than that, stocks still have a good run ahead of them. However, if the earnings growth falls back to a 7% or 8% handle, stocks will fall. Additionally, I do not see a long list of undervalued non-AI companies. Thus, I conclude the gold rush has room to run. I’ll keep you posted on what my models are saying as we go.

If you would like to communicate with me directly, email me at info@gregdonaldson.com  

Paul Volcker Taught Us How to Tame Inflation

I started writing a monthly investment update for the investment firm I was with in 1975. I didn't know what I was doing at first, so the older people in the firm would feed me what to say, and I would write the update.  This was just a few years after the OPEC oil embargo and inflation had shot higher. As the months rolled on and inflation continued to rise, I found fewer and fewer of the old-timers were stepping up to tell me what to say, so I became a student of the Federal Reserve in order to have something halfway intelligent to say. That was no help for several years.  Inflation remained persistently high. At times, prices changed on grocery shelves and gas pumps while I was standing in front of them, ready to make a purchase.  Interest rates kept going higher and higher, and none of the Federal Reserve's rate hikes seemed to make any difference.  

An inflation mentality set in on Wall Street, Main Street, and Ivy Street. Inflation became a way of life. We had silly government programs such as Whip Inflation Now (WIN) and a lot of other kinds of cute sloganeering that was not rooted in any economic truth because very few people really understood inflation and how it worked. 

We all became followers of the money supply.  M1, M2, and M3 discussions went on at social gatherings like somebody somewhere knew what it all meant.  "Too many dollars chasing too few goods" became the wink and a nod answer to all things inflation.

There was one man who did understand what drove inflation and how to control it. His name was Paul Volcker. Volcker was promoted to chair of the Federal Reserve in 1979. He immediately began a series of rate hikes that would drive the Fed Funds rate up from around 11% in September 1979 to 20% in March 1981. The 6’7”, cigar-chopping man taught us all that in dealing with inflation, the right course of action was to use a leading interest rate strategy instead of a lagging strategy.  In effect, Volcker made it clear verbally and by his actions that wherever inflation went, he would push interest rates even higher. His leading strategy was truly remarkable, and it broke the back of the inflation panic that had been raging through the economy for years. Inflation peaked at 14.8% in March of 1980 and by 1983 had fallen below to near 3 %. 

Today, we face another inflation crisis and the same 'we got this thing under control' illusion that I watched play out for years in the late 1970s.  Modern Monetary Theorists, who spoke so boldly of 'we got this economic thing' and advocated dumping huge quantities of dollars onto anyone who could breathe, have become silent. They should have done so much sooner.

Inflation is as much of a psychological phenomenon as it is a monetary phenomenon. The present Fed has been saying 'we got this thing' for too long.  They are losing both the psychological battle as well as the monetary battle. They must come out of today's meeting with two huge changes in what they say and what they do.  First,  they must say "Paul Volcker taught how to tame inflation, and we are now following his playbook." Second, they must raise Fed Funds by at least 1% and promise even more 1% hikes in the future. Jerome Powell must ignore the politicians, jump straddle inflation, and fight it with tools history shows us have worked.  If he continues to bow down to the politicians and make small interest rate hikes, we may be fighting inflation four years from now.

I believe the stock market understands what needs to be done and will soon find a bottom if the Fed takes a tougher stance. If the Fed keeps nickleing and diming us along, stocks will likely keep falling because big investors know that the longer we allow the current lagging interest rate strategy to prevail, the worse will be the ultimate recession.

The illusion of 'we got this thing" should end today."         

Why Weak Economic News Might Be Good for Stocks

As we mentioned in last week's article, we are providing our most current outlook on global economic growth.  We will update our projections periodically to reflect our latest views.

Economic indicators have been very confusing for investors.  “Good news” about economic growth has been perceived by the markets as “bad news”, as it could lead to reduced monetary stimulus from the Federal Reserve.  In this article, we will identify some key economic information and separate each point into good news and bad news, then come to a final consensus as to our specific views about the economy and how it will impact stock market growth moving into 2014. 

1. Slow Economic Growth

Economic growth in the United States has been mostly flat coming out of the recession in 2008-09.  In the 2^nd quarter of 2013, real GDP growth was a mere 2.5%.  The economy has been “muddling along” for quite some time.  We anticipate slow economic growth will continue into 2014. 

Driving the Bull: Dividend Growth Pushing the Market Higher

Now that the government shutdown is past us and the debt ceiling has been pushed out for the near term, we thought it would be an interesting exercise to share with our readers some recent research that we have done in attempting to identify which types of stocks are doing the best in the current bull market.  

S&P 500 Total Return Analysis

The stock market has had a strong run since 2009.  Over the last 12 months, the S&P 500 is up approximately 25%.  We broke the S&P 500 companies down into quintiles of 100 stocks each and ordered them according to largest to smallest in 4 different fundamental categories including sales growth, earnings growth, dividend yield and dividend growth.  We then calculated the total return (dividends and capital appreciation) for each quintile over the last 12 months.

Pent Up Demand: A Future Driver of Economic Growth

Pent Up Demand Pushing Cyclical Stocks

We are coming out of a lengthy period of decreased spending in the wake of 2008-09, which has built pent up demand for automobiles, housing and capital expenditures.  The average age of vehicles on the road has reached a record high of 11.4 years.  Demand for new houses fell off dramatically since the Great Recession.  The average U.S. home was built in 1974 and continues to age. 

As people have chosen to fix rather than replace their vehicles and homes, we’ve seen the replacement-type industries do very well.  Auto Retail’s 2^nd quarter sales and earnings per share were up 14.7% and 18.6%, respectively.  Home improvement retail grew sales nearly 10% with earnings up 20% from 2^nd quarter 2012.

To Dividend or Not to Dividend, That Is the Question?

To dividend or not to dividend, that is the question?  In 2011, most of what we have been saying about dividend stocks for the last 15 years came into full view for everyone to see.  In a weak stock market, the cash payments distributed by dividend-paying companies were more highly valued than betting on the come with the non-dividend payers.  During most of the year, the dividend yields of many stocks were higher than the yield on a 10-year U.S.Treasury bond.  This fact alone lifted many consumer staple, energy, health-care, and utility stocks.  Taken as a group, dividend-paying stocks significantly outperformed non-dividend paying stocks.

In 2011, dividend-paying companies, particularly those that have a history of consistently raising dividends, gradually were seen to be bond substitutes.  This is due to the compounding effect of rising dividends.  A company with a 3% dividend yield today will be yielding 6% in ten years if its dividend grows at a 7% annual rate.   A company yielding 2% today with its dividend growing 12% per year will yield near 7% in 10 years.

During the year, dividend paying stocks became the equity asset of choice.  There was almost a perfect symmetry between dividend yield and total return:  The higher the stock's dividend yield, the higher was its total return for the year.  For example many utilities enjoyed total rates of return of 15% or more in a year when the S&P 500 grew by about 2%.

But here in 2012, the robust early gains for the S&P 500 (5%) and the Global Dow (10%) have presented investors with a very difficult question:  Do we continue to focus on the "knowns"of dividend investing, or do we abandon them for the  "unknowns"  of gut feelings and hot tips?

The reason this question is so important is because the impressive stock market gains in the new year have caused many strategists to raise their estimates of 2012 stock market performance to 15% or more.  A 3% dividend yield looks good in a 2% stock or bond world, but it does not stack up so well against 15% returns.  Because of this many articles have been written arguing its time to move away from dividend investing and start pursuing growth again.

We would argue that dividend paying stocks are likely to perform just as well as non-dividend payers, even if stocks rise by 15%.  The reason is simple, our valuation models now predict that the average stock in our portfolios, which has a 3.5% dividend yield, is undervalued by almost 25%. You must remember, we focus on rising dividends.  To achieve a steady stream of rising dividends, a company must also have a solid stream of growing earnings.

In short "To Dividend or Not to Dividend" may be a false question.  Dividend-paying stocks can offer market-type returns when stocks grow by up to 15%.  In our experience, dividend-payers only begin to lag the overall market when the S&P 500 grows by 25% or more.  Even then, they will get most of the gains.

Considering how well the dividend payers do in down markets, and in view of all of the uncertainties in the world, we still believe "To Dividend" is the right answer for most people.    

We own dividend-paying stocks.

United Technologies: The Hidden Dividend Star

United Technology (UTX) is the Dividend Star most of the simple dividend-growth filters miss.  This is because they do not raise their dividend every year. UTX takes action on its dividend every six quarters, not every four quarters, as do many dividend stars.

I have even tried to explain to the company's investor relations department that while their every-six-quarters dividend hikes has been quite predictable, that such a policy means that about every three years their annual dividends flat line. Thus, the company is not included on many lists of companies with long-term histories of consecutive dividend hikes.  No matter says the company. They like to do it the their way.

In this case who am I to push against such a winning record, just to make it simple.  UTX has one of the most consistent dividend growth records of any company I follow.  The following are their 20, 5, and one year annual dividend growth rates.

1. 20-year growth rate  11.3%
2. 5-year growth rate    12.5%    
3. 1-year growth rate    12.9%

To top it off, the estimate of UTX's three to five year dividend growth rate is just under 12%.  At that rate of growth its dividend will triple over the next ten years.  Not bad for a company that has a current yield of 2.6%.

Despite UTX's consistent dividend hikes and earnings growth over the last twenty years, the Dividend Valuation chart at the top of this page suggests that the company is significantly undervalued based on the historical relationships among its price growth, dividend growth, and interest rates.  UTX's current price (red line) is much lower than its current valuation (blue bar) and even lower yet, than our estimate for next year (checkered blue bar).

The so-called Correlation Index, which measures how tightly the average stock is tracking the major indices, has risen to as high as 85% in recent weeks.  Its normal reading is near 15%.  This means that the constant on again off again European bail out proposals have turned what is normally a market of stocks into a stock market.  What I mean by this is that almost all stocks have been caught in the maelstrom of big up and down days, which would indicate that all companies have about the same future profit and dividend potentials.  If you take a few minutes to think about this, the truth almost smacks you in the face.  The one thing we know for sure is that the future prospects are not the same for all stocks, thus, it is just a matter of time before stocks start to trade on the bases of their own unique fundamentals, not the generalized fears of the European situation, no matter how things turn out.

In this regard, we believe UTX has quite a pedigree and will ultimately break away from the pack and show it star quality..   

I own UTX.

Have Multinational, Dividend-Paying Companies Become the World's Safest Investment?

Investment Policy Committee Notes

Summary Points:

•  Debt ceiling saga continues to keep markets in flux
•  Debt Rating agencies forewarn of credit downgrades for the world’s few AAA rated countries
•  The European Union scrambles to reschedule Greek debt
• The Municipal bond market somewhat stagnant as investors await Congress’ decision on the debt ceiling
•  2^nd Quarter company earnings continue to outperform

Discussion

Needless to say, there is a barrage of perceived and real worries in the world today.  Most pressing in our view, however, is the topic of the United States debt ceiling, and the anticipated outcome of Congress’ decision to either raise the limit or let the U.S. default.  The Donaldson Capital Management Investment Policy Committee (“IPC”) discussed at great length what truly constitutes a default. We have read many publications, and watched several news conferences in order to learn of the possible outcomes.

Timothy Geithner, the U.S. Secretary of the Treasury, seemed to dance around an interview question on the plausibility of the U.S. defaulting on its obligations.  Although he did not confirm that the U.S. would default, he did say that by definition the U.S. could be in a ‘technical default’.   Essentially we understood this to mean that without the debt ceiling being raised, with the current level of Government outlays exceeding tax revenues, certain obligations would not be paid.

This is where it gets a bit fuzzy.  There will be a natural order to things, or rather, a priority of who will get paid first in the hierarchy, but how that order is defined is the real question.  While difficult to determine who would get paid and who wouldn’t, the Government realizes that its creditors are made up of countries and large institutions with a strong investing prowess. Therefore it is very important the U.S. make good on its debt obligations to these creditors because we will have to go back to them for future borrowing needs.

However, should the U.S. fix its deficit issues off the backs of those dependent upon their monthly paychecks such as retirees or the disabled by taking away or reducing these benefits?  Either way you look at this issue, it’s very difficult to determine the best way to solve the problem at hand. 

The markets have responded to the expanding uncertainties with mixed emotions.  They have become more volatile in the past few weeks but have traded in a reasonably narrow range.  What seems to be the issue with the uncertainty is uncertainty itself. 

Another correlating variable to the volatility of the markets is the debt rating agencies’ warnings of decreasing credit ratings for some of the strongest countries in the world.  Standard & Poor’s rating agency, along with Moody’s and Fitch’s have all stated they will remove the U.S's AAA rating should either no deal, or a perceived insignificant deal, be passed.  This trend has extended, however, to other countries such as Germany.  This is rather surprising considering the positive attention the Germans have received for their strong fiscal budget and spending discipline.

This may be an unprecedented time in history to have the world’s ‘riskless’ investment (i.e. U.S. Treasury bonds) take on the risk by being downgraded.  What, then, should the world use as a benchmark for risk premiums, capital cost configurations, and the like?  It is the belief of the IPC that no matter the outcome, the U.S. policymakers will do what they can to prevent default and perhaps safeguard the status quo.

Not only so, but as it pertains to investors, differing investment options are graded on a curve. When surveying the world and all the differing investment securities available (from stocks, to bonds, to cash, to foreign currencies or securities, etc) investors perform a mental accounting to rank various investment options against each another.  While there is the real possibility the U.S. debt rating could be downgraded, generally speaking the U.S. is still one of the safest places in the world to invest one’s money. 

A comparison to the bailout plan offered by the European Union to support Greece shows the situation in the U.S. could be much worse.  Private holders of Greek debt are taking a 21% haircut on their investments, which is causing grumbling among investors.  As we have seen, a rippling effect can occur across the European Union should one country default on its obligations.  We are optimistic, however, to see that a new Greek debt restructuring plan should whittle down the country's debt-to-GDP ratio closer to 100% (a more manageable level). 

The IPC then turned its attention to the municipal bond market and noted that the issuance of new bonds has slowed dramatically.  It would take several more paragraphs to explain why, but Congress’s decision to limit new Treasury bond issuance as we near the federal debt ceiling has had the effect of reducing the number of new municipal bonds coming to market.  Therefore, the municipal bond market has now been, at least temporarily, impacted, by the debt-limit standoff.

That is not good news, but there is some good news about credit quality in the municipal bond market.  A recent analysis of our bond holdings showed significantly more upgrades than downgrades.  In fact, the municipal bond market as a whole has fared very well this year, especially in retrospect to analyst Meredith Whitney's dire prediction.  If you remember, she proclaimed there would be hundreds of billions of dollars worth of defaults in 2011.  So far in 2011, only $750 million have defaulted; a far cry from her forecast.  This compares to the amount defaulted in 2010 and 2009 of $2.5 billion and $4 billion, respectively.

Lastly, the IPC discussed corporate earnings for the 2nd Quarter.  So far in this earnings reporting season, a little over 200 companies within the S&P 500 have reported.  Earnings have continued to outperform in both year-over-year growth,18%, as well as earnings surprises,7.5%. (defined as the difference between actual earnings and analysts’ estimated earnings.)  These big earnings gains have also resulted in sizable dividend hikes.  In our two main dividend investment styles, dividend increases over the last year have averaged nearly 14%, the highest growth rate in many years. 

In the spite of all the news that is causing volatility in the stock market, U.S. companies are still expanding and growing at an impressive rate.

Many questions remain regarding the final outcome of the debt-limit stalemate in Congress.  Because this stalemate involves the heretofore safest investment on earth, U.S. debt securities, the options for a perfectly safe hiding place are very few.  Furthermore, we remain convinced that this stalemate will be broken and when it is the few investments that are doing well right now like gold and Swiss,Canadian, and Australian currencies will fall in price.  In essence to invest in these securities at this time is to bet that the U.S. will not only default but remain in a defaulted condition for an undetermined time.

As we have said on many occasions, it is becoming clear that high-quality, multinational corporations may now be the safest investments in the world.  They have piles of cash, significant free cash flows, modest debt loads, compete in every corner of the world and charge a price for their services dictated by the market and not decree, pay taxes in every country in which they operate, and return a significant portion of their annual earnings to their shareholders in the form of dividends.  Go back through this list of attributes and you will find few similarities with most sovereign debt in the world.

We'll report again next week on how the fiasco in Washington DC is playing out.

Dividends Are Rocking and Rolling

Dividends have rocked and rolled over the past five and half years.  The question is where will they be dancing from here?

The chart at the right shows dividends paid by S&P 500 companies on a rolling 12 month basis since December of 2005.

For the first three years of this period, dividends rolled higher, peaking near $31.  Beginning in August of 2008, dividends fell like a rock, a move that more than wiped out the gains since 2005.  Since the early part of 2010, dividends have once again reversed course and are now rolling back toward their old highs.  Can this roll continue, or are there more rocks in our future?

Over the last 12 months, S&P 500 companies have paid roughly $25, still far below the nearly $31 all-time high they recorded at the peak in 2008.  However, the red dashes at the far right of the chart show Bloomberg's quantitative estimate of total dividends paid by year-end 2011.  Bloomberg believes that the current roll will continue.  They estimate total dividends for 2011 will reach $29, not far from the all-time high.  Bloomberg also estimates that the old high will be reached by the end of 2012.

If 2011 total S&P 500 dividends paid do reach the $29 estimate, it would mean that dividends would have grown for the year by nearly 21%.  Many analysts estimated that S&P 500 earnings would likely grow at that rate,  however, almost no analyst we follow made such a bold estimate for dividends.  After all, corporations have been fiercely focusing on free cash flows, and dividend payouts diminish cash.

We believe this dividend revival makes complete sense.  Corporations have produced tremendous free cash flows in recent years.  This build up in cash has three main potential uses: 1. share buy backs, 2. acquisitions, and 3. dividend hikes.  The companies we follow have done a little of all three, but they have hiked dividends at a higher rate of growth than we would have expected.  We believe the reason for this has been the growing recognition by many firms that dividend-paying stocks are enjoying renewed interest among many investors, particularly those near or in retirement. In hiking dividends they are just doing what their shareholders want.  I realize this is a very novel idea -- that a company would do what its shareholders want -- but we believe that is exactly what is happening.  There are some firms that have hiked their dividends two and three times in the last twelve months.  Activity of that kind is not an accident.  They know what they are doing and they have the cash flows to afford it.  We believe this dividend roll will continue.

If dividend hikes have been on a roll and stock prices follow dividends, a theory to which we subscribe, then current stock prices may roll a lot higher.  We would not be surprised to see them back to their old highs seen in 2008.  This won't happen in the next six months, but we can see it occurring by the end of 2012.

There are certainly all kinds of worries to contend with, but having a positive outlook is sometimes the best strategy when everyone seems to be throwing rocks at the market's prospects.

A Lot of Bullet Points That Add Up to Stocks Being Higher by Year-End

Summary Points:

• Continuing to assess stock market outlook – balance still positive
• Recent pullback in stock prices has been moderate on low volume

Discussion

The Donaldson Capital Management Investment Policy Committee continued our review of economic data and forecasts for the year. While the economic headwinds are much in the news, it is our experience that positive events get less play in the media than negative ones. To try to identify an appropriate balance, while recognizing that items listed are not all equal in impact, we built our own list of significant headwinds and tailwinds.

 Headwinds

• QE 2 ends this month.
• The May new jobs number came in way below trend.
• The European Economic Community has not yet solved the Greece problem.
• Consensus 2011 global GDP growth expectations have dropped 0.5% or so.
• National average house prices are still dropping.
• The unemployment and “functionally unemployed” rates have ticked higher.
• State and local governments are still eliminating jobs.
• Savings rates are high, potentially reducing consumer spending.
• Gas prices are ~$1/gal. higher than a year ago.
• Congress has not passed a solution to the Deficit and Debt problems.
• Regulatory uncertainty exists in regards to: health care, taxes, and banking.
• 3/11 Tsunami had bigger effect on supply chains than was previously thought.

Tailwinds

• Reported corporate profits remain strong.
• Estimates for 2011 corporate profits have held, despite economic headwinds.
• GDP growth outside the U.S. and Europe remains robust.
• Capital asset purchases (e.g. trucks, cars) are recovering significantly.
• Banks are seeing a slowing of defaults on mortgages and credit card debt.
• The weaker U. S. dollar is boosting U. S. exports.
• A debt default by the U.S. is seen as very unlikely by most economists we follow.
• Stock values (price/earnings) are now lower than the 80-year average. No bubble
• About 50% of S&P 500 sales come from faster growing, non-US economies.
• Crude oil and gasoline prices are dropping from recent highs.

The Committee also reviewed a discussion by The Bank Credit Analyst of the US economic outlook. BCA is a Canadian firm (which we believe gives them objectivity about the U.S.) that we’ve followed for many years. Their analyses are well reasoned; they do not rant or get emotional; and, they use data to develop and explain their views. A synopsis of their June 8 presentation follows:

• US growth will accelerate later this year.
• Tsunami-related supply chain problems are easing.
• The savings rate is high, but slowly dropping, benefiting consumer purchases later.
• Housing is too low to sink much further, reducing its drag on the economy.
• US structural deficits are only about 5% of GDP, more manageable than many think.
• The US tax/GDP ratio is the lowest in G-20, encouraging economic growth.
• The US has added more than 1.3 million net new jobs over the past year.

The Committee was concerned about the Fed’s recent lobbying for the 35 largest banks to raise their Tier 1 capital levels from 7% to 10%. This will continue to put pressure on bank stocks in the near term because of the potential dilutive effects of big equity underwritings. So far, this is still in the talking stage, and the banking industry is pushing back very hard. It remains to be seen how this will play out, but for the moment it has already been priced into the stocks, so any softening of the Fed’s position should provide a quick lift to the banks.

Although industrial stocks have dropped more than the S&P 500 lately, most industrial companies continue to have very bullish outlooks for 2011. CEO Sandy Cutler of Eaton Corp (ETN), for instance, is very confident his firm will see 14% revenue growth with earnings growth much higher than that. Many of Eaton’s customers delayed purchases of expensive capital goods during the recession, but these customers are now back in the market because the average age of their equipment has reached multiyear highs, causing repair costs to jump. This same dynamic is playing out across the spectrum of a number of industries.

Unemployment remains stubborn. Historically, however, the correlation between increased corporate profits and increased employment is very tight. The two trends separated during the recession. However, the average work week, especially in the industrial sector, has extended to the point where more overtime just may not be possible. The longer corporate sales volumes and profits grow, the more pressure there will be for businesses to increase hiring.

While major new negative developments in the Middle East, a major economic slowdown in China, or a fiasco on the debt limit in Washington D.C. could turn the 2011 outlook decidedly negative, we don’t consider any of them as having a high probability at this time. Our views are echoed by the economists and strategists that we follow. The market pullback over the past six weeks – the first six-consecutive week pullback in 10 years – has been relatively modest, less than 5%. Finally, trading volumes have been relatively light, potentially indicating there is not a lot of urgency in the selling.

After considering all the above, the Committee is holding to its outlook for stocks to return 5% - 10% for all of 2011. Of course, we will continue to monitor the data and the economic and political environments.

Edited by Randy Alsman

Greg Donaldson Mike Hull Rick Roop Randy Alsman

We own many industrial stocks including Eaton.

Sell in May And Go Away . . . . At Your Own Risk

Because stocks have had solid double-digit gains over the last 12 months, we hear many people predicting that they are ready for a fall.  In addition, the "Sell in May and Go Away" crowd is giving us all the statistics of how stocks have fared between May and November historically.

The reasons given for a stock sell off are full of language about momentum, price gains, and too much-too soon. We want to add very quickly that few of the "stocks are too high" crowd today were among the "stocks are too low" crowd  at the market bottom in March of 2009.  Indeed, if you go back to their blogs and read what they were saying around the bottom of the market, you will find many of them were saying "stocks are too high," even then.

In the blizzard of words we see written about the stock market, we seldom see the word valuation.  Valuation, it would seem, has no meaning in a high-octane traders' market, where computers are trading with computers for about 70% of the daily volume.  Individual investors seem to have decided that long-term value investing has gone the way of the Oldsmobile.

Ah, but we beg to differ!   In the long-run, valuation will rule just like it always has.The reason is over the last 80 years, S&P stock prices are highly correlated to both After Tax Profits and Dividends.  The computers and traders will wage their daily battles of betting on zig or zag, but in the long-run, zigs and zags will ultimately be seen as vanity, a chasing after the wind.

From a valuation perspective, stocks are still cheap and could only become expensive if the economy were to fall off a cliff and drag earnings and dividends with it.  The chart below shows index of the S&P 500 (red line) compared to Total U.S. After Tax Profits Index (blue line).  Please note that After Tax Profits reached an all time high in December of 2010 and, based on S&P estimates, will rise by nearly 13% in the second quarter of 2011 versus the same quarter a year ago. Tracking the After Tax Profits Index is our favorite way of measuring earnings, because it measures only earnings that companies actually paid taxes on.  

The graph below vividly shows that while After Tax Profits have reached an all time high, the S&P 500 has not. In fact, the chart suggests that the S&P has a long way to go to reach fair value.

Corroborating the view that stocks are still undervalued is the graph of the S&P 500 Index (red line) compared to Total Corporate Dividends Index (blue line).  Total Corporate Dividends paid is an important indicator of the health of the current turn-around in the stock market, because dividends are paid in cash and not promises.  As the chart shows, dividends took a hit during the sub prime crisis.  Importantly the chart also shows that they have turned higher.  S&P is predicting that dividends will grow nearly 10% on a year over year basis for the first quarter of 2011.  Dividends have not reached a new high, but we believe the old record will be eclipsed over the next 12 months.  This would be good news for continued stock price gains.

These two simple, yet important measures of stock market valuations are still flashing green.  That does not mean that stocks will go straight up from here.  In our judgment, it does mean, however, that saying stocks are too high is nonsense, and "Sell in May and Go Away" is worse.

The Dollar's Slide: Terminal or Temporary?

We’ve had a number of clients write or call us lately concerned about the continuing weakness of the U.S. dollar. (It’s down about 10% since December against a basket of currencies.)  Here’s a representative example of their concerns:

“I feel the weak dollar (and growing weaker) is causing us problems and will cause greater problems if the world loses confidence in the US dollar as the world's monetary standard.  Oil is priced in $'s and the dollar's weakened position is costing US and world consumers.  When will the world say enough is enough and then what happens to the US economy?”

There is and old saying among economists that goes: “The solution to high prices is high prices.”  By this they mean that because of the law of supply and demand, higher prices tend to lead to lower demand.  Eventually, this lower demand will cause the sellers of the products to cut prices in order to regain the lost demand.  In this way, higher prices are self-correcting.

The dynamics of currency exchange rates are similar.  To a great extent, the problems tend to correct themselves over time.  As a quick primer, there are five major dynamics that have the most influence over the value of a country’s currency:

Interest Rates:  Holding everything else constant, higher interest rates for a given country relative to its trading partners would cause its currency to strengthen because the high rates would attract buyers.

Inflation:  Higher inflation in a country relative to its trading partners normally weakens its currency.

Balance of Trade: Shifts in a country’s balance of trade exert pressure on its currency.  Growing exports relative to imports strengthen its currency; weakening exports do just the opposite.

Budget Deficits:  Higher budget deficits as a percent of GDP weaken a country’s currency, while lower budget deficits strengthen its currency.

GDP: So long as a country’s inflation rate is muted, the higher the country’s GDP, the stronger will be its currency.

As with most aspects of investing, the expectations of how each of the above factors will behave in the future have as much impact on the value of the currency as their current levels.

This analysis, unfortunately, may produce as many questions as it answers, but such is the nature of discussing currencies.  Someone once said, “When it comes to currencies, everything affects everything.” Having said this, currency fluctuations are a daily concern for us because we own so many foreign based stocks.  Thus, based on our current holdings, we are keeping an eye on the Canadian dollar, the British pound, the Chinese yuan, the Swiss Franc, the Danish krone, and the euro.

Using the above five factors, let us offer a brief analysis of the most likely trend of the U.S. dollar over the next few years. 

• Short-term interest rates in the U.S. are among the lowest in the world.   However, when the current round of quantitative easing (QE2) ends in June, those rates should rise, at least a little.  Further, the Fed is expected to begin raising the Federal Funds Rate (FFR) – now at 0.0% - 0.25% by year end.  So, both ending QE2 and raising the FFR should lift the US$.
•  Core inflation in the U.S. is hovering around 1%, very low compared to our trading partners.  Thus, this is favorable for the dollar.  However, if inflation gets too high, the Fed will raise interest rates to fight it.  (Higher interest rates = stronger currency, part of that self-limiting mentioned above.)
• A cheap dollar makes U.S.-manufactured goods more competitive overseas, helping to boost U.S. exports.  Higher exports improve our balance of trade and GDP and should give a lift to the dollar.  This is a prime example of the self-correcting qualities of a weak dollar.  Ironically, however, a weak dollar means that the cost of imports rise, especially oil.  This puts upward pressure on inflation.  Are you getting the picture of the concept of “everything affects everything?"
• Budget deficits and high U.S. debt relative to GDP are the big killers right now for the value of the dollar.  Standard and Poors’ (S&P), in its recent change of outlook for US debt from stable to negative, said one of the reasons for the action was their belief that prospects for meaningful deficit reduction in the current political climate were low.  As you remember, the Dow Jones fell over 200 points for the day on that news, and S&P’s action jumped from the financial pages to the dinner table.  In doing so, S&P may have done us all a favor by turning up the heat on Washington to make progress on budget cutting.  S&P’s message was clear: clean up your financial house or face a downgrade of your bonds.  Downgrade or no, deficits will continue to play a role in the direction of the dollar.
• The United States GDP is the largest in the world, so that helps.   But it is not growing as fast as GDP in the developing countries of China, India, Brazil and other Asian countries.  Indeed, U.S. GDP is growing more slowly than the global average right now, which has somewhat of a weakening influence on the dollar. 

So there you have it. Combining all these factors and comparing them with similar data from our major trading partner nations is producing a negative demand for the US dollar against most other major currencies.

We believe the two primary drivers of the weak dollar are the negative attitudes by some about QE2 and the size and growth rate of the US budget deficit.  As you know, we have been in favor of QE2 because we believe it has provided needed stimulus for the economy and consumer confidence.  We also believe the Federal Reserve has the will and the power to terminate it without disrupting the markets.  Our view has been validated by the rising stock prices over the last six months; unfortunately our optimism has not been shared by the currency traders.  With QE2 coming to an end, it would seem some pressure on the dollar should abate.  

The problem with the budget deficit is too big to solve in the near term.  Indeed, it is exacerbated by the political divide in Washington.  Yet, the problem is too big to ignore any longer.

As we have evaluated the issues surrounding the weakness in the U.S. dollar, in many cases, we believe they are self-limiting or self-correcting.  However, as we said earlier, the biggest problem facing the dollar is the lack of confidence in Washington’s willingness to make the tough decisions to limit the growth of the U.S. debt.  In light of this, pressure on the dollar may continue.

This discussion of the dollar is not simply an answer to a client question.  We deal with currency decisions everyday.  Four years ago we concluded that the dollar was likely to trend lower.  That was even before, the huge increase in government debt.  We redirected our portfolios to benefit from a falling dollar.  At present, more than 60% of the revenues of the companies we own comes from outside the US. Not only are our companies more competitive as a result of the lower dollar, but when their foreign profits are converted back into dollars, they are higher than if they had been produced in the U.S.  Additionally, nearly 20% of our portfolio companies are domiciled outside the US.  With these companies we are benefiting not only from their growing earnings and dividends, but also from the currency translations.  As an example, one of our biggest holdings is Nestle (NSRGY).  A few years ago Nestle’s stock price in Switzerland ended the year flat.  Taking into consideration the currency translations from the falling dollar versus the Swiss franc, NSRGY made a total return of nearly 11%.

Next time we’ll take a swing at the U.S. dollar’s declining importance as the reserve currency of choice.

Written by:  Randy Alsman and Greg Donaldson

Principals and Clients of Donaldson Capital Management own Nestle.

GE's Second Dividend Hike: Good News or Bad News?

GE's announcement of a 17% dividend hike on top of their 20% hike earlier this year was the topic of lively discussion at our investment policy meeting on Monday.

We all agreed that on the surface the news was good for GE and stocks in general, but several committee members voiced a surprising concern.

First let me share the positive implications we believe GE's dividend actions signal.

1. Their loan loss ratios in GE Capital (35% of the company) must be improving faster than previously expected.  This would be good news for both GE and the US economy.
2. An up-tick in their long-cycle industrial sector (jet engines, healthcare electronics, and power generation) may be underway.  Better news in these industries would be very good news for US trade balances with developing nations.
3. Short-cycle businesses (appliances and electrical system equipment) may have bottomed.  This would be modestly good news about US consumer spending.

We were surprised and delighted by GE's second dividend hike, and because GE is so large and so broadly diversified across the US economy, we believe many other companies may also be experiencing better-than-expected results. This would portend more higher-than-expected dividend hikes. And since our theory is that dividend hikes are the best sign that a business is growing, a spate of better-than-expected dividend hikes should also lead to higher stock prices.

The surprising concern that arose in our discussions was the possible negative implications of the dividend news. Two of us voiced the concern that because Jeffrey Immelt, GE CEO, has become so unpopular among many investors and analysts, the dividend hikes may only be his attempt to win favor with his constituents. This line of thinking didn't go far because one of the committee members reminded us that CEOs don't dictate dividend policy. That authority belongs to the board of directors.

The chart at the top of the page shows that GE is stair-stepping its way higher. The recent new, intermediate high signals the stock may attempt to move higher over the near term. If our notion that GE's business is improving starts showing up in their earnings, we could soon see GE take a run at a new 12-month high.

We own the stock. Do not make investment decisions based on this information. Please consult your personal financial advisor.  

  

Since the Subprime Crisis Began, Higher Dividend Growth Has Been Rewarded -- Up to A Point

We recently completed an analysis to determine how companies with rising dividends have fared during the last three years, a time when overall dividend payments by S&P 500 companies were falling. 

We divided all dividend-paying companies in the S&P 500 Index into quintiles ranked according to their average annual dividend growth over the past three years. A sixth group consisted of those companies that do not pay dividends.    We then computed the average total rate of return for each quintile over the three years. 

The results are impressive and a bit surprising.  The seventy companies with the highest average annual  dividend growth rates over the past three years have outperformed 58% of all stocks in the S&P 500.  By contrast, the companies with the lowest average annual dividend growth  rate (actually a loss) only outperformed 28% of the stocks in the S&P 500.  Here's the ranking for all dividend-paying quintiles and non-dividend payers:

1. Quintile with the highest average 3-year dividend growth outperformed 58% of all S&P 500 stocks.
2. Second highest quintile outperformed 61% of all stocks. 
3. Third highest quintile outperformed 53% of all stocks.
4. Fourth highest quintile outperformed 51% of all stocks.
5. Fifth highest quintile outperformed 28% of all stocks.
6. Non dividend paying stocks outperformed 48% of all stocks.

To better understand these data, it is helpful to show the 3-year average annual dividend growth rate for each quintile.

1. Quintile 1:  3-year average annual dividend growth rate of 21.8%
2. Quintile 2:  11.3%
3. Quintile 3:  6.1%
4. Quintile 4:  0.0%
5. Quintile 5: -28.0% 

The bottom line is if a company began the period paying a dividend and did not cut it, it would have outperformed at least 51% of all stocks.  A company improved its performance relative to all stocks the more it increased its dividend, except for those companies in quintile 1. 

The surprise in the data is that quintile 2 stocks, with an average 3-year year dividend growth of 11.3%, outperformed quintile 1 stocks, which had a 3-year average annual growth rate of 21.8%.

We have two comments about this surprising asymmetrical result: 1) the very high dividend growth observed in quintile 1 stocks was influenced by many large one-time dividend increases among consumer cyclicals and industrial stocks; 2)  In spite of this, we see a similar asymetrical result when comparing earnings growth versus price growth.  The stocks in the quintile with the highest earnings growth did not outperform those in the second quintile. 

Thus, in looking at both dividends and earnings we see that high growth has not been rewarded with proportionately higher price growth. This is the primary reason that we now believe the sweet spot of the stock market is in the high dividend and earnings growth companies.

We will review a few of these companies in the weeks ahead.

Bloomberg data was used for this analysis.    

Channeling Ben Bernanke

Somewhere in Washington DC Ben Bernanke is surely smiling, if only slightly.  In recent weeks, stocks have been rising and last week the Utility Index (XLU) broke to a new 12-month high, signaling that investors may be willing to take on more risk.

Amid all the worries Ben carries on his shoulders about the viability of the US economy, he has to constantly be aware of the shifting moods of the players, consumers, and business people, in the current unfolding economic drama.  Ben knows what he needs most right now is a catalyst to lift the "animal spirits" of the players so they will return to more normal consumption and investing patterns.

Click to Enlarge

There has been precious little "feel good" news in the economic data for most of 2010.  Home prices are still wallowing at low levels; unemployment is still sky high; and until recently, stock prices have flat-lined.

There has, however, been lots of good news in the earnings reports of major corporations.  But with all of the ill winds in the economic news, many investors have concluded that these earnings increases are the result of expense reductions and layoffs and will only make the US economy worse.

Ben is smiling because he knows the earnings are real, and that rising earnings will ultimately lead to job growth.  He also knows that rising stock prices in the face of poor economic news are a good sign because it means that investors are beginning to look through the current malaise to better times.

The utility index breaking to a new 12-month high is important because, as we have said before, utilities are generally considered to be bond substitutes.  Their dividend yields are more than double that of the average stock; they usually operate with some kind of monopoly power, and their financial ratings are higher than the average stock.

History shows us that almost all major turn-arounds in stocks have been led by the utilities.  As investors become more confident and begin to move out of bonds, their first landing place is usually in the stock sector they consider to be the safest.  For most people that is the utilities.  Thus, it is not surprising that in the recent uptick in stocks, utilities have broken above their 12-month highs, while the S&P 500 Index is still nearly 3% under its 12-month high.  We would expect that the S&P 500 will follow the utilities lead and break to a new intermediate high by the end of the year.

This move will be driven by the recognition that stocks are cheap compared to bonds and that Ben will see to it that bond yields won't be rising anytime soon.

Utility Watch: Still Waiting For The Breakout

As I said last time, we are watching the utility sector for clues about the future course of stocks overall.  The good news is that last week the Utility Sector (XLU) made a new 2010 high.  The not-so-good news is that its price did not exceed the December 2009 high. 

Utilities are a key indicator because they possess two important qualities.

1. History shows us that they usually lead stocks out of bear markets and corrections.
2. They are in the category of bond-like stocks that has been doing very well in recent months.

The bond-like qualities of utilities may be the most important indicator in the current market.  Bond prices continue to surge, with the 10-year T-bond now yielding under 2.5%.  By contrast, the current dividend yield of the utility sector (XLU)  is approximately 4% and, according to Bloomberg, has produced dividend growth of over 5% per annum over the past five years. 

I was modestly disappointed that XLU did not pop north of the December 2009 high in last Friday's big up move.  However, hot markets do not usually draw lots of investors to the slow-moving utilities; thus perhaps Friday's action should have been expected.

Another reason I am so interested in the utilities is that they are widely owned by individual investors.  A continuing uptrend in XLU would suggest that individuals may be accumulating their old faithful sector.  The other old-faithful dividend sector, banks, has completely betrayed the individual investor with dividend cuts and continued turmoil. 

If the utilities keep moving higher and break above their old high, it would not stretch the imagination to think that they might continue to move higher than most people now believe.  The reason is simple:  There are not many sectors of the stock market that have treated long-term investors very well in recent years.  The old favorites, health care and banks, have both let investors down over the last decade.  Only the utilties have provided a solid return during this time.

Our Dividend Valuation models are suggesting that utilities are as much as 25% undervalued.  Maybe just maybe, this industry has it affairs enough in order that they will pierce their 2009 highs and break into new territory.  That is what we are counting on.

Donaldson Barnyard Forecast is Positive for Stocks

Randy Alsman, VP and Senior Portfolio Manager, describes the most recent reading from our proprietary Barnyard forecast and explains how we arrive at the scoring.



This is a video/audio webcast. If you are unable to view this post, click here.

Rising Dividend Investing
http://www.blogcatalog.com/directory/business/investing/stocks/