Wednesday, April 27, 2011

The Dollar's Slide: Terminal or Temporary?

We’ve had a number of clients write or call us lately concerned about the continuing weakness of the U.S. dollar. (It’s down about 10% since December against a basket of currencies.)  Here’s a representative example of their concerns:

“I feel the weak dollar (and growing weaker) is causing us problems and will cause greater problems if the world loses confidence in the US dollar as the world's monetary standard.  Oil is priced in $'s and the dollar's weakened position is costing US and world consumers.  When will the world say enough is enough and then what happens to the US economy?”

There is and old saying among economists that goes: “The solution to high prices is high prices.”  By this they mean that because of the law of supply and demand, higher prices tend to lead to lower demand.  Eventually, this lower demand will cause the sellers of the products to cut prices in order to regain the lost demand.  In this way, higher prices are self-correcting.

The dynamics of currency exchange rates are similar.  To a great extent, the problems tend to correct themselves over time.  As a quick primer, there are five major dynamics that have the most influence over the value of a country’s currency:

Interest Rates:  Holding everything else constant, higher interest rates for a given country relative to its trading partners would cause its currency to strengthen because the high rates would attract buyers.

Inflation:  Higher inflation in a country relative to its trading partners normally weakens its currency.

Balance of Trade: Shifts in a country’s balance of trade exert pressure on its currency.  Growing exports relative to imports strengthen its currency; weakening exports do just the opposite.

Budget Deficits:  Higher budget deficits as a percent of GDP weaken a country’s currency, while lower budget deficits strengthen its currency.

GDP: So long as a country’s inflation rate is muted, the higher the country’s GDP, the stronger will be its currency.

As with most aspects of investing, the expectations of how each of the above factors will behave in the future have as much impact on the value of the currency as their current levels.

This analysis, unfortunately, may produce as many questions as it answers, but such is the nature of discussing currencies.  Someone once said, “When it comes to currencies, everything affects everything.” Having said this, currency fluctuations are a daily concern for us because we own so many foreign based stocks.  Thus, based on our current holdings, we are keeping an eye on the Canadian dollar, the British pound, the Chinese yuan, the Swiss Franc, the Danish krone, and the euro.

Using the above five factors, let us offer a brief analysis of the most likely trend of the U.S. dollar over the next few years. 
  • Short-term interest rates in the U.S. are among the lowest in the world.   However, when the current round of quantitative easing (QE2) ends in June, those rates should rise, at least a little.  Further, the Fed is expected to begin raising the Federal Funds Rate (FFR) – now at 0.0% - 0.25% by year end.  So, both ending QE2 and raising the FFR should lift the US$.
  •  Core inflation in the U.S. is hovering around 1%, very low compared to our trading partners.  Thus, this is favorable for the dollar.  However, if inflation gets too high, the Fed will raise interest rates to fight it.  (Higher interest rates = stronger currency, part of that self-limiting mentioned above.)
  • A cheap dollar makes U.S.-manufactured goods more competitive overseas, helping to boost U.S. exports.  Higher exports improve our balance of trade and GDP and should give a lift to the dollar.  This is a prime example of the self-correcting qualities of a weak dollar.  Ironically, however, a weak dollar means that the cost of imports rise, especially oil.  This puts upward pressure on inflation.  Are you getting the picture of the concept of “everything affects everything?"
  • Budget deficits and high U.S. debt relative to GDP are the big killers right now for the value of the dollar.  Standard and Poors’ (S&P), in its recent change of outlook for US debt from stable to negative, said one of the reasons for the action was their belief that prospects for meaningful deficit reduction in the current political climate were low.  As you remember, the Dow Jones fell over 200 points for the day on that news, and S&P’s action jumped from the financial pages to the dinner table.  In doing so, S&P may have done us all a favor by turning up the heat on Washington to make progress on budget cutting.  S&P’s message was clear: clean up your financial house or face a downgrade of your bonds.  Downgrade or no, deficits will continue to play a role in the direction of the dollar.
  • The United States GDP is the largest in the world, so that helps.   But it is not growing as fast as GDP in the developing countries of China, India, Brazil and other Asian countries.  Indeed, U.S. GDP is growing more slowly than the global average right now, which has somewhat of a weakening influence on the dollar. 
So there you have it. Combining all these factors and comparing them with similar data from our major trading partner nations is producing a negative demand for the US dollar against most other major currencies.

We believe the two primary drivers of the weak dollar are the negative attitudes by some about QE2 and the size and growth rate of the US budget deficit.  As you know, we have been in favor of QE2 because we believe it has provided needed stimulus for the economy and consumer confidence.  We also believe the Federal Reserve has the will and the power to terminate it without disrupting the markets.  Our view has been validated by the rising stock prices over the last six months; unfortunately our optimism has not been shared by the currency traders.  With QE2 coming to an end, it would seem some pressure on the dollar should abate.  

The problem with the budget deficit is too big to solve in the near term.  Indeed, it is exacerbated by the political divide in Washington.  Yet, the problem is too big to ignore any longer.

As we have evaluated the issues surrounding the weakness in the U.S. dollar, in many cases, we believe they are self-limiting or self-correcting.  However, as we said earlier, the biggest problem facing the dollar is the lack of confidence in Washington’s willingness to make the tough decisions to limit the growth of the U.S. debt.  In light of this, pressure on the dollar may continue.

This discussion of the dollar is not simply an answer to a client question.  We deal with currency decisions everyday.  Four years ago we concluded that the dollar was likely to trend lower.  That was even before, the huge increase in government debt.  We redirected our portfolios to benefit from a falling dollar.  At present, more than 60% of the revenues of the companies we own comes from outside the US. Not only are our companies more competitive as a result of the lower dollar, but when their foreign profits are converted back into dollars, they are higher than if they had been produced in the U.S.  Additionally, nearly 20% of our portfolio companies are domiciled outside the US.  With these companies we are benefiting not only from their growing earnings and dividends, but also from the currency translations.  As an example, one of our biggest holdings is Nestle (NSRGY).  A few years ago Nestle’s stock price in Switzerland ended the year flat.  Taking into consideration the currency translations from the falling dollar versus the Swiss franc, NSRGY made a total return of nearly 11%.

Next time we’ll take a swing at the U.S. dollar’s declining importance as the reserve currency of choice.

Written by:  Randy Alsman and Greg Donaldson

Principals and Clients of Donaldson Capital Management own Nestle.

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

I always said the debt was the "killer" in the pack.
The US must clean their own house and quit diverting attention to Greece, Spain, etc.
We need to follow their example and take the pill no matter how bitter.
A weak dollar, what about living in a second world economy?

Anonymous said...

Greg and Randy:

Interesting and timely discussion as we now are all "currency traders" given the incremental 3-4 quarters of 0% interest rates greenlighted by Bernanke this week. Tell me where the dollar goes from day to day, and I'll tell you where risk assets are going!

I'm not smart enough to know if the USD will continue to be a funding currency forever, but right now it is.....as evidenced by the only corrections that have occurred in stocks and commodities since QE2 began were driven by exogenous forces (Europe debt, Middle East tensions, and Japan, etc.) when those dollars came flying home to settle short term margin.

One element I would like to add to the discussion, however, because I think it may be moreso important relative to the economic implications you thoughtfully outlined, is the size of the monetary base relative to overall US GDP. It is currently sitting at an all-time high of near 20% ($3 trillion Fed balance sheet vs. $15 trillion GDP) versus historical norms in the 8-12% range, and 15% at the peak of the financial crisis a few years back.

That's a lot of dollars floating around lowering the value of each unit, and is likely the direct result of the dollar losing 40+% of its value since 2000, when the Fed became intimately more involved in economic and market affairs. That, and a direct result that we "should" have destroyed a lot of dollars as a function of debt destruction/restructuring during the financial crisis, even if it wasn't politically viable.

Today, with the Fed unlikely to shrink its balance sheet anytime soon, and the economy continuing to grow below trend (real GDP likely peaked in Q4), its unlikely that 20% threshhold of the Fed's balance sheet relative to GDP will change/deviate much for the forseeable future.

Setting aside the broader economic environment, in addition to the fact that risk is being greenlighted at the expense of the dollar, the key question then becomes (as Gross at PIMCO and others are just now beginning to ask): following QE2, where does the funding of Treasury auction flow come from without the $100+ billion monthly heroine injection from the Federal Reserve?

Unless you can resolve that the Fed will not be engaged in debt monetization after QE2, which seems unlikely as they are already jawboning about the debt ceiling, the world's largest bond investor is sitting them out, and China is diversifying its $3 trillion in reserves, its hard to see compelling reasons to be an investor in the greenback no matter what the economic situation may be with the likely hood that dollars are going to continue to be printed (actually "credited" out of thin air) increasing almost daily.

I should note that I'm not an investor in precious metals - I'd rather own cash generating businesses - but I do see the arguments. And I also own above average levels of cash, even if it is the most hated trade on the planet right now!

Hope all is well down south. Randy, have fun in Europe and keep an eye on my folks. Dave G