Tuesday, June 16, 2009

The Pause

About two weeks ago, I wrote a blog entitled "The Bottom Is For Real, But a Pause is Due." My reason for that blog and this one is to help my readers understand the push and shove of markets.

You may wonder why a number of my recent blogs have discussed elements of technical analysis, such as moving averages, levels of support and resistance, etc. Chart reading coming from a guy whose motto is, "so goes the dividend, so goes the stock," would seem to be a contradiction in terms. Technical analysis is for traders, isn't it. Technicians are people who couldn't care a twit about the fundamentals of a company or the products they make.

The truth is I grew up reading charts. I managed money in my early years using almost exclusively charts combined with a bit of macro-economics. That all changed in the crash of Black Monday in 1987. Something in me gave way that day. Something said that I should be buying, even though all my charts were saying to sell.

Since that day, I have become predominantly a fundamental investor. After searching for a number of years for a fundamental metric that best predicted stock prices, by the early 1990s, I was convinced that the metric I was in search of was dividend growth.

Having said that, at Donaldson Capital Management, we use any indicators we can find that work. Thus in our firm at present, we use three markers or predictors to determine what to buy and sell: 1.) dividends to select individual stocks and determine market valuations; and, 2.) macroeconomics to grasp the lay of the economic landscape; and, 3.) technical analysis to validate the first two predictors, as well as to provide clues about the economic landscape that the fundamentals do not explain.

Here is what our assorted markers are saying about the current situation.

1.) Using data from our Dividend Valuation Models, we believe that stocks are at least 25% undervalued based on the long-term relationship of prices, dividends, and interest rates. Thus, from a valuation perspective, the path of least resistance for stocks is up.

2.) Our macroeconomic view is that things are "less bad" than they were just a few months ago. A number of economic data points such as the sales of existing homes are trying to bottom but few, if any, economic data are showing genuine growth. This suggests that there is little fuel in sight to push stocks significantly higher. This would argue for stocks to pause at this level.

3.) This is where technical analysis comes in very handy. The chart above shows that in recent months stocks have made a solid turn, pierced the 50 day moving average, and are now trying to move through the 200 day moving average. Our experience in technical analysis tells us that a move through the 200 day moving average without a fundamental catalyst will be difficult. Thus, technically speaking, stocks are a bit overbought and in need of some consolidation, or sideways motion. This sideways trading is likely to be of a sawtooth pattern because the economic news is "less bad" and not yet good.

We believe that increases in corporate earnings expectations will ultimately be the catalyst that will push stocks through their 200 day moving average. Earnings have fallen like a stone for the past two years. But corporations have been slashing costs and earnings expectations for the S&P 500 recently ticked higher for the first time in a long time.

Cobbling together the three markers, we believe argues that stocks are likely to trade in a sideways range for at least another month or so. Coincidentally that is about the amount of time until the next earnings season. If corporate earnings come in better than expected for the second quarter, we believe stocks will pierce the 200 day moving average and push to higher levels. If earnings fail to surprise to the upside, stocks will likely continue to trade between 8000 and 9000 on the Dow Jones 30, awaiting better economic and earnings news.

We do believe that the March 9th bottom in stocks will hold under almost any circumstances. In March, stocks were pricing in the worst case scenario. The stabilization of the banks and the better news coming from the real estate market argue that the worst is over. We are now awaiting some of the green shoots that Fed Chairman, Ben Bernanke, described to blossom.

2 comments:

IndyFriend said...

http://bigcharts.marketwatch.com/charts/big.chart?symb=djia&compidx=aaaaa%3A0&ma=None&maval=9&uf=0&lf=1&lf2=4&lf3=1024&type=2&size=2&state=8&sid=1643&style=311&time=12&freq=1&mocktick=1

Now that is a more fair chart to show your readers; the last five years-linear.

Oh, I would protest that you are using a Dow Industrial chart, but I know that people of your generation love the Dow--even though it has been mis-operated in a very poor way lately. I don't think I could use it, being price weighted and having a board that didn't have the tenacity to remove companies from it until they were in all practicality removed off the NYSE! Gee do you think having so many stocks at one point below the $10 mark muted it's effectiveness, both up and down? Regardless, its chart is remarkably similar to all the others.

One does need to remember that a chart only reflects what has happened and what has been built into the market action. Clearly, the last 12-14 weeks have built in a lot of expectation that THIS was the rally off the bottom and we're moving on from here. There simply is no argument that a chartist can make otherwise, no matter whether one uses candlesticks, OHLC, point-n-figure, the charts are all very constructive.

I can only say this; charts are reflecting hope right now. I don't think doom and gloom happens, but I do think something like Moses wandering through the desert for 40 years is what follows. Hopefullly for only 5-7 years--I'll still be in my 40's then and get to see what true recovery looks like.

The market will do what it does and the economy will do what it does. Only if the disparity between the two grows too wide will there be jarring actions. I think Greg has seen this story before-it's call the '70s...

Anonymous said...

It would be interesting to hear your interest rate assumptions - assuming that the S&P 500 is 25%undervalued here according to your model, that would suggest a level of approximately 1125-1150, yielding a 15-20x multiple depending on whether you believe the 60ish or 75ish camp earnings estimates. (I would note Morgan Stanley currently has a $51 earnings level on the S&P 500)

I'm in the camp that believes "real" interest rates are MUCH higher than the market perceives....absent the Fed's liquidity-sponsored reflation trade.....as money demand remains very high (even as the Fed tries to nuke the dollar and punish savers).

If that's true, a higher level of "real" rates suggests a much cheaper multiple than 15-20x....at least in the interim, and I know DCM has a longer-term bent.

The question becomes - does the market pay, even in the medium term, for things to be "less bad" (as in cost cutting) or does it pay for things to be "much better" (as in demand and revenue growth). And if its the latter, where does the "growth" come from without the blantant manipulation of the currency or unsustainable debt loads?

Lastly, setting aside the fundamentals and technicals, what about the "structural" conflicts - what does the world look like if/when the government isn't backing debt, what happens to credit costs, what happens to ROE's as regulation floods the system, what happens as our trading partners worry about themselves ("buy china")?

Don't get me wrong, the time to be too bearish has probably come and gone, but as Indy eludes, a true recovery continues to appear to be years, not quarters away....unless the Fed lets prices fall where they should. And by then, the "credit" noose will be wrapped around all of us via higher taxes and a larger interest burden.......which will be the true silent killer of a rapid recovery.



Regards,
Dave G