Tuesday, June 02, 2009

The Bottom is For Real, But A Pause is Due

The stock market has rallied sharply since the middle of March leaving a lot of bears wandering and wondering in the woods.

The chart at the right shows that the Dow has rallied close to 2000 points, or nearly 30%, since the bottom on March 9. The chart also shows that the Dow has now reached the 200 day moving average (blue line). We think the market may pause here. One reason for this belief is the long sideways trading action from July 2008 through the middle of October 2008. This trading range left a lot of traders with significant losses as stocks collapsed in February. Human nature says those traders will become sellers as the market moves closer to Dow 9,000.

We believe this pause in the market's recent upward march will be temporary. Stocks will continue higher later in the summer as Wall Street earnings estimates begin to turn higher in recognition of an improving economy.

As you may remember, we said on March 20, that we believed forces were in place to produce a turn in stocks. We have reiterated that call three additional times since then. The bottom line on these calls was and is the undergirding and strengthening of the banks.

We believe the collapse in the market in February was caused by Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner's February 10th speech that was supposed to answer all of our questions about how the government was going to rescue the banks. Mr. Geithner did not distinguish himself in that speech and questions began to fly about the possibility of "nationalizing" the banks. Bank nationalization fears were unleashed when Mr. Geithner announced that the banks would be subjected to rigorous stress tests.

Nationalization of the banks combined with the realization that the US auto industry was bankrupt caused investors to "think the worst" and abandon stocks. Stocks finally found a bottom as the Administration repeatedly promised that they had no intentions of nationalizing the banks. Indeed, the Administration continued to champion the idea that the banks were in reasonably good shape but needed more capital, which they were willing to provide.

By late April the results of the stress tests were announced and showed that only about half of the banks tested needed additional capital and none of them appeared to be close to a government takeover.

Stocks gained upward momentum as those banks who were cited as needing more capital were able to sell additional stock in the open market. This would have been impossible before the results of the stress tests.

Adding power to the run-up in stocks has been a string of economic news that can best be described as "less bad" than before. Few data show truly good numbers, but it is clear that the economy is starting to respond to the Fed's very low interest rates and numerous programs to aid homeowners.

The news will not show positive data for many months yet, but we believe the worst is behind us.

1 comments:

Anonymous said...

While we can all appreciate a little optimism, i can't help but offer there appear to be far too many structural imbalances in play. To be fair, you admit that the news will continue to get worse.

1) Are the banks healthy? If so, couldn't they prove it by canceling the PPIP program. While i don't do conspiracy theories, the Q1 earnings were manufactured via mark-to-market and AIG CDS trading unwinds, which conveniently led to a fresh dilution tour as ratings upgrades were met with fresh equity issuances. Will this be the last time they need capital? Citi has come to the market 9 times, saying this is the last time. Wells Fargo can't be immune to the travesty going on in the Governator's Caylee-ah-fornia.

2) We have yet to address the underlying problem - too much debt and not enough income and savings. What has changed on that front? In fact, wages are now under further pressure, credit costs are going up, and savings for most are in the tank (30% hits to 401ks, and 25% hits to housing). Those of us who don't have debt, are having the credit noose tossed around us by Uncle Sam via fresh bailouts, stimulus programs, and higher taxes. Does that make me want to go spend?

3) A large majority of the rally has solely been attributable to dollar devaluation - as a result no "wealth" was created.

4) While the spike in the yield curve is being looked at by inflationistas and those viewing an imminent recovery, the facts remain that it is a direct result of mortgage convexity hedging as well as our foreign creditors moving to the front end of the curve (see # 3 above). Neither is bullish - in fact, it forces Bernanke's hand on the ability to fund his "project". If he loses his ability to nuke the dollar further, and is forced to withdraw liquidity, asset prices will collapse. Hard.

5) While everyone claims the credit markets have thawed, I work directly in the credit markets - and trust me, things aren't as rosy as the media would like you to believe. Holes that aren't directly being plugged by Bernanke and Co. are not functioning. The securitization markets which fueled the recent boom aren't coming back.

6) How can 4% mortgages and $30/oil be a "tax cut" on the way down, but a 6% mortgage and $70/oil is viewed as a "sign of recovery"?

7) Global tensions are running high. History suggests that deep economic periods typically precede wars. We all hope this doesn't happen, but our Korean friends seem to remind us that tensions are running high.

In concluding, maybe 9000 is a fair target for the Dow and maybe the bottom is in. It has been a spectacular rally, and quite frankly, we all needed it. But eventually, the fundamentals will catch up to it.....and as you note, a pause is overdue. But from where I sit, i think we could be at 9000 in 3 years as well. Expect volatility to rule the way, with swings between 6,000 and 11,000 for years to come.

About the only thing i know for certain, is that the world will be a very different place on the other end of this cycle - common sense would suggest taking it one step at a time.

I hope this finds you well. Dave G