Thursday, March 26, 2009

Is This The Bottom? Part ll

Last week with the stock market having turned modestly higher, I asked if this turn could hold when so many other recent upturns have failed.

I concluded that my answer was yes; not because the chart of the Dow Jones Industrial Average looked good, but because of the massive under girding of the economy by the various government programs that would shore up the banking industry, unfreeze consumer lending, and stimulate spending. I should have added something that I have been saying for months: the law of supply and demand.


Sometimes I think the US media are the most economically illiterate people in the world. They simply have no idea of the power of the free market and the law of supply and demand. The free market (of course with proper regulation) is simply a marvel at setting price where the merchandise will sell.


As we are all too familiar, the US has been in an incredible housing recession over the last two years, which has caused prices to fall by 25% and more in certain areas. Countless news media reports I have read have been saying that there was no end in sight. Prices and housing unit sales could only go lower. They were partly right. Prices are going lower, at least for a little while, but housing on a unit sales basis has had some very good news in recent days, and I believe it is one of the big reasons that the stock market has risen nearly 600 points since last Friday.


Last week new building permits and housing starts were surprisingly strong, and this week new and existing home sales were much higher than expected. Home prices, indeed, have fallen and will continue to do so until excess inventory is worked off, but unit sales of homes appears to be turning up in many parts of the country. Importantly, if unit home sales have bottomed and are turning up, they will ultimately take home prices . . . and stock prices with them.


I do not want to discount the good durable goods orders data this week, or the new program announced by Treasury Secretary Geithner to rid the banks of toxic loans. The latter particularly is vital to the health of the banks. Having said this, housing on a unit basis appears to be bottoming, and housing is the key to a sustained rally in stocks. The simple reason is this: housing got us into this mess, and I believe housing will have to get us out.


As I write this, the market is pushing 8000 on the Dow. I would be a very surprised person if the recent upturn races right through 8000 and keeps going. If you look at the chart above, you will see that 8000 was an important level of support from October through November. There are plenty of sellers waiting at the 8000 level to sell out and get their money back. Thus, I would predict some back and forth sideways motion for a few weeks as we digest recent data and evaluate new housing statistics for a corroboration of the recent good news.


If this is the bottom in housing unit sales, it has come the old fashion way: by prices falling to a point where the buyers were waiting, and the same goes for stocks.


A bottom in housing unit sales would be welcomed news, but for a full turn around to begin in the economy, we need home prices to at least flatten out. That has not happened yet, so the stock market will remain on edge. But this was a very good week for stocks and lends credence to the notion that we have seen the bottom.

2 comments:

IndyFriend said...

Why is it that even the most sane investor must look for *the* bottom??

It is a nice rally off of lows. It has some nice features including four 10:1 up days, some nice back n fill, but-especially this week we are seeing less enthusiastic volume with a levitating market. Yesterday was less than impressive, yet we managed to tack on a nice percentage.

The best I can say is that the charts are constructive and will remain that way as long the S&P churns between 750-870... We break 870 and I will be much more bullish; we break 750 and I will be taking cover. That is it. That is the chart's voice.

Remember that we had a minimum of four 25% + rallies during the '00-'03 bear market. Fantastic trading opportunities, but the market either hit lower lows or gave it all back in serious retests. I have also heard people saying this is it b/c it is the best month in a couple decades. A look at the Traders Almanac will acknowledge that March will go on the record book--around 18th-- in the "best % up months since 1950" on the Dow. I noticed March of '03 was nowhere to be found--or any other '03 number. You see, by the time the bottom came, there was no party, no hope, no belief that "this is it"...

Regarding supply and demand, I agree the problem we face is concerning it, but my read is different. Sure there is demand but it is provisional demand. Provisional in that I know people who'd like to move, but can't sell their home b/c it is underwater. I know people who want to buy, but now the very real 20% down and Fico standards preclude them from doing so. I specifically know of various businesses in Indianapolis that would like to take advantage of market clearing prices as competitor go by the wayside, but credit-lines have be reduced or removed. I think a lot of the "stimulus" is being offset by local government and by banks protecting their balance sheets.

We could see some nice short term pop in consumer spending--a lot of people of all tax brackets are getting nice tax refunds. But then that is going to make our governments projections even worse and increase their drive to increase taxes. Short term pleasure converts to long term drag on the economy.

We have chosen the path of Japan. That is Geitner's plan. He is creating a synthetic shadow banking system subsidized by the government. We can not solve our credit and leverage problem with more credit and leverage. That is merely three card monty... Credit destruction and de-leveraging is the only long term solution. Do we delever to 1:1? Heck no! But it will a much lower than the current ratios.

The government also seems to be choosing the route of onerous regulation of the banks going forward rather than a forced dismantling of the largest (a la AT&T) money centers. In my opinion, this is a poor choice. Although if they decide to get more involved in regulating the insurance industry, I wouldn't oppose that change...

It has been a wonderful rally. It warrants caution and deep analysis, not hope and a blind eye. See your advisor and develop a plan you can believe in.

Anonymous said...

It certainly didn't take long for the "positive" feelings to resurface after Obama and crew's public relations stint.

The question is how long will it last?

I'm hoping for the best, but preparing for the worst.

The underlying facts don't change - we are currently coming off of 3 bubbles: i) a housing bubble, ii) a spending bubble, and iii) a credit bubble.

While housing prices are falling, credit standards are skyrocketing.

Spending patterns, for consumers and corporations, are likely to go on for a prolonged retraction.

And the credit bubble......well, let's just say we bit off more than we could chew and that is likely to dramatically impact the average attitude towards debt in the future, which directly impacts risk taking.

We all want a bottom, but to think that a bottom will occur this soon, or even that it is nothing but blue skies from here on out, after the bursting of repeated bubbles is unlikely......despite the amount of money we throw at the problem. In fact, a primary reason that stocks have ripped lately is probably due to the debasing going on in Washington.

The credit markets remain under pressure......and they usually have a better read on the fundamentals.

Hope all is well. Dave G