Soon, we will begin to see the outlines of the Obama plan to aid the banks. The administration has said that after Secretary of the Treasury-designate, Timothy Geithner, is approved by the Senate he will describe the administration's programs aimed at unfreezing the banks.
In recent weeks, the idea of an "aggregator bank" appears to be gathering steam. The aggregator bank would buy the bad assets, or toxic loans from the banking system at heavily discounted prices, which would then allow the banks, sans the toxic loans, to get back to banking.
This may sound much like the original TARP plan, but that plan was scuttled after it became clear that the economy was slowing much more rapidly than anyone had thought. This necessitated that the banks first be provided with more capital to allow them to withstand the increased loan losses that were hitting all their product lines. The aggregator bank would operate along the lines of the Resolution Trust Company (RTC) which was very successful in cleaning up the S&L crisis of the late 1980s and early 1990s.
The idea of the government getting more involved in the banking system is a scary thought, especially when congressmen and women all speak in a four-word mantra: loan money or else. Forced lending on housing by the government is one of the reasons we have a credit crisis. There are also fears that some banks will be nationalized, or taken over completely by the government. All of this combined with just awful earnings from the banks to send stock prices scurrying to recent lows.
Timothy Geithner is a name we are all going to hear about on a daily basis. Let's hope that he has a better stage presence that Henry Paulson. I'm not as down on Mr. Paulson as many people, but I do agree with his detractors that the TV cameras were not kind to him, making him come off as winging it too often. In fairness to Mr. Paulson, since he was seeing things on a daily basis that he had never seen before, maybe winging it was all he could do.
I continue to believe that far too many investors are betting that a depression type decade is ahead of us. I simply cannot get there based on what I see. We have a massive bank bailout plan combined with a massive fiscal stimulus package for the economy. Taken together they could total over 10% of GDP. That magnitude of underpinnings for the economy will have an positive effect. If it does not, then the laws of supply and demand have been rescinded. That cannot be true because the law of supply and demand is what brought us the banking crisis we now face.
I continue to be more optimistic than the headlines you are reading on most media. Remember this: no one thought the tech boom would ever stop and therefore investors bid tech stock P/Es up to triple digits. The law of supply and demand has now reduced tech stock PEs to the mid teens, a painful recalibration. No one thought that real estate would ever fall in price, thus no price was too high to pay for a square foot of prime real estate. Today it was announced that the price of of the average house in the US had fallen by nearly 15% from a year ago.
There is no shortage of bad news, but the laws of supply and demand have not been rescinded. In today's bad news about housing there was some good news that got very little press:
- Jan. 26 (Bloomberg) -- Sales of previously owned homes in the U.S. unexpectedly rose from a record low, propelled by the biggest slump in prices since the Great Depression as foreclosures surged.
The second part of the news story got lots of ink. The first part, which is just as important, got very little ink. Yes prices are falling, and we are still immersed in a real estate correction, but just as certainly are the bargain hunters now in the game. Last month there were 4.74 million previously-owned homes sold in the US, up 6.5% from the same month a year ago. In addition, the Conference Board's index of leading economic indicators also rose modestly. The first rise in six months.
The real estate market will not turn in a made-for-prime-time, high-definition broadcast captured by old news and new news alike. It will turn in a ragged, ugly, halting manner, but it will ultimately turn. It's good news that more houses are are beginning to sell around the country, even if prices are still falling. There is life in the housing market. The oversupply of housing has driven prices down to meet demand. In a few months, the government will announce that prices have stopped falling. That will be a happy day for all of us. My prayer is that Timothy Geithner plays a big role in causing that good day to come swiftly.
5 comments:
I applaud you for returning to housing after the "beating" you took following your Jan. 13th Blog on the possibility of nearing a bottom in real estate. It is like a boxer that has taken the punches and is able to get back in the ring and fight on.
Pessimism is always easier to sell than optimism. That is why so many people miss the bottom and only begin the chase when the "horse has left the barn".
How is that for a bunch of mixed metaphors.
Before we start opening the champagne, let's not forget that upwards of 40% of home sales are foreclosures. Sure, at some point housing will stop dropping, but there is no rational reason to believe it will be in a few months. There are no quick fixes for this financial/economic crisis. It was the result of lots of very foreseeable imbalances that will take some time to get back to healthy levels.
It has been a VERY bad call to be so blindly optimistic during the biggest correction in most people's lifetimes. The economy and financial system have been glaringly unhealthy. Placing hope in every new initiative or government action is simply wishful thinking.
I can't afford Champagne.
It has been a tough downward ride.
I agree there are no quick fixes for the damage that has been visited on this and the world economy.
This will have to work itself out over years. As you say the imbalances are large.
But on the other hand, a sale is a sale whether it is foreclosure or whether it is overpriced by 30% as was the case in the past. In the end it does reduce the overhang of unsold properties.
The asset value is declared and allows the seller of the asset to move on.
I am happy someone else is picking up the "toxic assets" besides the government as I am sure whomever that is sees some value there and in the end will turn their own profit or loss. These buyers are at least saying for themselves that this is a bottom.
In reviewing all of the gambling that has been going on over the years in tech, hedge funds, derivatives, commodities and housing, I for one am betting on the people moving into the real estate market now. This is the not the government but the private sector begining to take action.
Supply and Demand are dynamic variables. While we saw one "bright" data point in the housing numbers, one shouldn't and mustn't turn a blind eye to: a) the shadow inventory being accumulated by banks in the form of foreclosures yet to be put on the market or in REO holding and b) the saturating demand with each unemployment report, which from the daily earnings releases appear to be accelerating.
Good luck bottom fishing in this environment. Call me in 2013 when there may be some semblance of a new bull market.
2013 is a long way off.
I may not even be here.
I may have passed on.
It is amazing how we forget that life is also a dynamic process and it ends too soon for many.
I tend to count each day as my best day for the next day is always in question.
I agree blind optimism without deep analysis is in fact foolish.
Unfortunately much of the current downturn is a result of such blind optimism. It was felt that housing prices and badly crafted investment vehicles would continue climbing in value forever. It was assumed that a house was an investment and not just someplace to live.
In point of fact everyone got greedy, the lenders, the buyers, the sellers, the SIV sellers , the ones buying the SIVs and then just like Piranha gorging on a corpse, it is gone too quickly.
But blind pessimism is also as poisonous as blinnd optimism.
Bottom fishing can be very interesting unless you think zero is the next stop because you can almost always catch a big fat catfish and eat for a long time, if you happen to like catfish.
Warren Buffet, I think, probably likes Catfish and I wouldn't bet against him either.
Post a Comment